Someday, of course, I will move out of this house and someone else will have the floor. Despite the unconvential inspiration for the floor, I think this is something that will be appreciated by future owners, although whether they choose to obscure it with a bathmat during the winter months, only time will tell. I say this because the floor has stood up very well to the toughest critics out there, and that is the trades workers who actually built the house. Many of them saw it, and they went out of their way to comment favorably on it. Any of you who have had a house built know this is very unusual - they have seen some very fancy houses, and for the most part, nothing fazes them.
Penrose tilings are named after the English Mathematician, Roger
Penrose. He knew when he discovered these tilings 30 years ago that
people would want to use them as I have, so he patented them. I waited
for the patent to run out before I made this floor - Kimberly Clark
did the same thing when they introduced Penrose tile toilet paper
about a year later, but Sir Roger (he's a knight of the realm) made
such a fuss that they pulled it from the market. It was never
available in the US, I would have happily purchased a lifetime
supply.
There are many features that Penrose tilings have, but what makes them
especially interesting is that with only two tiles you can be
guaranteed that the pattern is acyclic, i.e. that it will never repeat
(what this means will be explained in some detail below). The two
shapes that you see here are the ones that are most commonly used and
they are a slight simplification of what is needed to guarantee
acyclicality, but you can make up for that by the simple rule that you
cannot ever form a rhombus by putting the "inside" angle of the "dart"
(the smaller shape, colored blue on my floor) against the "top" angle
of the kite (the larger shape, colored white on the floor).
To get an idea of what acyclicity means, imagine you are visiting a
wallpaper store. You want some interesting wallpaper that one could
look at for a long time without getting bored. Some of the paper has
patterns that repeat very frequently - you would only have to move the
paper a few centimeters left or right, up or down to get the pattern
to repeat, that is, so that the pattern would superimpose perfectly
and out to infinity onto where it had been in its initial
position. There might be some more high priced wallpaper that depicts
a scene that takes several meters to repeat; often such wallpaper
features scenes of things like people in a village and serves as a
sort of substitute for a mural.
An acyclic tiling will never repeat. If you pick it up and superimpose
it over itself it will never line up perfectly. That this could be
done with a finite number of shapes had been known for a long time,
but Penrose proved you could do it with as few as two. This was then,
and remains today, a remarkable result, and this floor is a tribute to
that theorem.
There are many other remarkable facts about Penrose tilings. If you
look closely, you will see "bowtie" patterns, both small and
large. These often appear adjacent to one another, but can never
appear more than three in a row. Also, if you continue the tiling to
infinity, being careful to follow the rule not to create any two-tile
rhombus's, the pattern you get will be the same as the one anyone else
would have gotten no matter how they began or proceeded with
theirs. Either pattern would superimpose perfectly over the other.
Moreover, every possible finite sub-pattern will occur infinitly
often.
The golden mean, that ratio that figures so prominently in
architecture and nature, is very important here too. The ratio of the
areas of the two shapes is the golden mean. The ratio of the number of
the two shapes is the golden mean. The ratio of the long side to the
short side is the golden mean.
The kite-dart pattern I have used is not the only Penrose pattern.
When using ceramic tile, a design that uses the two rhombi might be
preferable, since the large angle in the dart led to manufacturing
difficulties. If I were to do it over, I would explore techniques
other than ceramic, including the terazzo that most others have used.
Here are some other links to Penrose tilings that I know of.
Incidentally, there is a flaw in the layout. Can you find it?